Media Manifesto, Y.Maezono

Yuta Maezono


My manifest focuses on how to deal with media and information that it reports—about media literacy. Media literacy is a competency that enables people to analyze, evaluate, and create messages in media modes. Today this manifest advises you what you should keep in mind when you watch TV, read newspaper, or surf the Internet.

Be alert to information media reports to you! When we try to report one news to someone we more or less need to cut or edit one fact and create our truth. It is physically impossible to report all information about the fact because of limit of time and money so the happening someone actually sees is different from the happening media reports. Media sometimes report not only the distorted truth but also false things. Please be aware that all information that we can get in any media forms is done with the media’s editing and choosing.

Guess purposes of media telling you information! Media is also business, and gains profit from companies, organizations, or personal customers. When media discovers a truth that benefits or harms business partners of the media, it tries to exaggerate or hide the truth. For example, when deceptive camouflage of places of food Disney Resort hotel serves was revealed, few mass media nor newspapers reported this issue. That’s because Disney companies were one of the biggest ad rate customers for media and newspaper so that they could put pressures over the media. Even the media cannot oppose to its customer for the business. Please take into account the business connections of media.

Concretely, I offer three suggestions about ways to deal with people. Get information from as many media as possible so that you can get closer to facts. Be aware that even media has something that it cannot report. Think of purposes of media reporting.

Media Manifesto, H. Akasu

Hideto Akasu

Be Active People

We are trapped into the gap between two different societies

The digital world got away from the real world in 1990s

The dominance of the internet always gives us this anxiety

That over-flooding of information shows we no longer have our privacy

But hey, look, why we ain’t get profit out of this digital world?

Why only selected elites enjoy their privilege while our view gets twirled?

Now is the time for revolution, my friend!

Domination in the digital world has to end!

We gotta walk together toward the dream of democracy

So that we can gather our power to bring forth equality

Mahatma Gandhi, never stopped his battle for liberty

but he wasn’t the only revolutionary trying to defeat difficulty

people, the causes were people

people, the changes were people

people, the heroes were people

and we all know that we are the people

Wanna know what’s going on in the world? Just look it up.

Wanna talk about some social issues with somebody? Just bring it up.

Wanna express how you feel about your life? Just write it up.

We can change the real society if we can change how we participate in the digital society

Sit down on your chair. Open your laptop. Participate a bit more actively.

That’s the only way and that’s how we do, seriously.

People—Sit down for your fight. Stand up for your right.

Media Manifesto, T. Miyoshi

Tomohiro Miyoshi

Manifesto on Indigenous Peoples in Latin America

Political participation of indigenous peoples is essential for the true development of Latin America. But they have been excluded from the Latin American politics, and the politicians from the dominant minority have attempted to destroy the indigenous cultures. Moreover, indigenous peoples, especially women and young people, have been underrepresented in the media, which poses challenges to their political participation. It is very important to ensure indigenous peoples’ rights of representation in media because media have a great impact on public opinion.

The political inclusion of indigenous peoples can be achieved through their representation in media. Therefore, education and training of the indigenous peoples is necessary to help increase their knowledge of new information technology that boosts their representation in media. In fact, the UN Department Programme (UNDP) tries to provide some of the indigenous peoples such as the Aymara, Rapa Nui, and Mapuche with training sessions in Chile on how to make a better use of information technology in order to boost their political representation. This training session greatly helped the indigenous groups of people actually improve their communication skills and participate in political arena. Therefore, we should actively adopt this method to help even more indigenous peoples learn about media technology and gain more parliamentary seats by utilizing the technology.

Although there are, as I mentioned, some efforts to include indigenous peoples in politics, their political representation is still very low. So far, Bolivia is the only country which has numerous indigenous peoples in the lower house of parliament. In other countries such as Mexico, indigenous peoples represent less than 10 out of 500 members of the lower house of parliament despite the fact that they make up the majority of inhabitants in many cities.We should not just allow nonindigenous groups to dominate the number of parliamentary seats because those groups have exploited the indigenous cultures and tried to foster a development based solely on economic aspects. They have totally ignored the development on the basis of cultural values, so they have tried to oppress the indigenous cultures and make them assimilate into Western cultures. Now we have to acknowledge that political representation of the indigenous peoples is an essential step toward the genuine growth of Latin American society. It is indigenous representatives who can preserve their own cultural values and open a new path for Latin American Indians.

Media Manifesto, S.M. Chew

Si Min Chew

Challenging Government Overreach Through The Media

The abuses of power of the government in the digital realm has escalated to immense proportions. In the US, under the outdated Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), the US government exercises overreach and misuses the law to cover situations that were never meant for its purview when the law was passed in 1986. Using the umbrella term of a “national security threat”, the CIA and NSA conducts mass surveillance of its own citizens and that of other countries too, amassing mass amounts of data of e-mail addresses, phone numbers and use of Internet data. Yet the big question is why does the NSA’s surveillance program capture more data on innocent Americans than on its intended foreign targets? The country has moved from the traditional notion of targeted surveillance to these mass surveillance efforts that were not even able to prevent the Boston Marathon bombings despite warnings from the Russian intelligence service to the FBI. The focus has been lost.

Today, technology is the greatest equalizer in human history, a tool that the people may use to stand up to the government. Authorities know this and fear it. Can individuals be trusted with the power of technology for creative means and not destruction? According to whistleblower Edward Snowden, it should be the people, not the government who decide. He gave information to the people so we may make a choice about the country we want to live in. A democracy facing occasional risk that is unpredictable or a more controlled society that is less free?

Internet freedom advocate Aaron Swartz said in his last interview that the Internet represents both the good—a provider of freedom—and also the bad—control and surveillance. “Both are amazing and great, but the question is which do we want to (emphasize)?” The power of the Internet gives power to the people and the government, and the latter has “assumed upon itself, in secret, new executive powers without any public awareness or any public consent and used them against the citizenry of its own country to increase its own power, to increase its own awareness.”(Snowden, 2014) We are now in a position where governments do many things in secret that compromise the people’s privacy. That in essence, represents a battle between security and liberty.

The pursuit of interests has become one that is focused on the state, not the nation. Now the public must champion its own interests. The persecution and indictment of hacktivists such as Jeremy Hammond, the late Aaron Swartz, Julian Assange and Edward Snowden, reflect the prioritization of government and corporate interests over individual rights. The truth needs to be told. The people should be the ones wielding the power in a democracy. The Internet gives us this power to leverage the playing field that has been dominated for so long. The information whistleblowers have revealed show the government’s misdeeds and their covert actions without our approval. Their acts of speaking out provide another platform and a new wave of indignation to ride on, for us ordinary people to act and protest for greater transparency. We can make the government listen to what we decide. We need to educate ourselves to discern the information that is presented to us, understand the history of our countries and become active political participants. The media should be a check against the government. Public-interest journalism should be protected all over the world. We can help to defend that through our readership and spreading the word around. Let us stand up everywhere to fight for the democracy we want. Everything big starts from the smallest actions. It starts with us.

Media Manifesto, L. Herrera

Luis Herrera

Media Regulation Manifesto

Media in its modern form surrounds us in every aspect of our lives. Media takes the distinct forms of television, radio, internet, newspaper, art, film, etc. Because of the different forms the media has today, it literally can present itself in every part of our everyday lives. For this reason, it becomes clear that the media can become a weapon for the powerful to use in order to influence our way of thinking about certain ideas. In this case, the government of countries is what uses the media to make sure that the people see only certain aspects of reality. In what is known as media conglomerates, corporate leaders take control of large chunks of the media and show only what benefits their interests. If a few media conglomerates had control of what is put on TV, the newspaper, and radio, then the people would be forced to take part in a government where diversity is limited.

Take the United States as an example. Much of what goes on television today is owned by a few TV conglomerates. Disney/ABC, CBS, and NBC are three giant conglomerates that own the majority of the channels on cable. What this implies is that the corporate leaders of these conglomerates decide what goes on in the majority of the channels that we can watch. We basically only have a little over three different opinions on newscast that we can view. Since politics in the U.S. is already extremely polarized, these TV conglomerates only contribute to the non-diverse politics present in the country. This was also the case in Mexico. Televisa, also a large television conglomerate, controlled the entire television world in Mexico during the time when the PRI political party was in power for 71 years. It is obvious that during this 71 year period, Televisa only showed programs and advertisements that catered to PRI. The same can be said about Grupo Clarin in Argentina and its manipulation of the media to support the military governments in power during the 1970s. There is no diversity, no voice for people in countries where the majority of the media is controlled by the minority.

For this reason, we must begin to demand that the government restructures the ownership of media and distributes these ownership rights to the people. In this way, we can avoid what has happened in other countries, which is the media manipulating the people and establishing unwanted regimes. By restructuring this ownership, more diversity will exist in politics which in turn can create more voices in the government. In order for this to function, we must look at Argentina’s Ley de Medios and analyze what they are doing right as well as what they are doing wrong and implement the same ideals in the United States. With enough voices calling out for change in media ownership, we can accomplish our goal of bringing more diversity to the media and creating more voices for the people.

El hogar al reves

Upside Down Home
Itzel Martinez del Canizo, 2014

Synopsis of the film:

Gerardo, Omar and Santos are teenagers living in a low-income housingin Tijuana. In addition to the great friendship, they share a deep emptiness in their homes; their mothers work all day at the factories. In their own personal ways, they cope with monotony, loneliness and the desire to thrive in a hostile place, which inevitably makes us question the results of development and progress in the contemporary large cities.
This is a story of realities and juvenile illusions in a context of difficulties and shortage, where dreams meet unexpected endings.

Pagina 12: Evo Morales

Evo Morales: “Estamos viviendo tiempos de retorno al equilibrio, a la igualdad”
Durante la ceremonia de investidura aimara, el reelecto presidente de Bolivia ratificó la necesidad del “retorno al equilibrio” entre el cuidado del ambiente y el desarrollo, la identidad indígena y la “revolución democrática y cultural” de su gobierno: “No planteamos volver al pasado. Se trata de una recuperación científica de lo mejor de nuestro pasado para combinarlo con la modernidad”.

Ante representantes de 40 países, entre ellos una delegación de alto nivel de Estados Unidos, que retiró su embajador en 2008, Morales reclamó “frenar la loca carrera de la destrucción de la Tierra en nombre del desarrollo”, y reivindicó el “vivir bien” de su gobierno en contraposición al liberalismo y al socialismo europeo, que “pasaron a la historia junto con la república liberal y colonizada de Bolivia”.To read the rest of the article click on the following link:

Pagina 12: Cultura



“Venimos de una hegemonía de la imagen

La periodista recorre en su libro las distintas experiencias de televisión alternativa que tuvieron lugar en Buenos Aires desde los ’80. “El objetivo es servir como una caja de herramientas” para los medios populares que se están desarrollando en el país.

Por Candela Gomes Diez

Desde su aparición en el mapa mediático, la televisión fue objeto de debates, odios y amores. En 1964, el filósofo y semiólogo italiano Umberto Eco desarrolló en su libro Apocalípticos e integrados las dos corrientes teóricas en las que se dividió el estudio de la cultura de masas. En sus páginas, el autor observa que mientras los apocalípticos adoptaban una postura crítica hacia los medios masivos, los integrados asumían frente a ellos una posición de defensa. Y es justamente este modelo binario el que posiblemente permite introducir a la comunicación alternativa como un tercer eje analítico de los medios.

To read the rest of this article click on this link: